Bartender educational programme
Abstract
To decrease alcohol consumption among patrons in student pubs by server-training programmes.
Educational programmes were given to bartenders (n=40) in a randomized design in six of 12 pubs on a university campus. Bartenders in control pubs were not given the programme.
Breath alcohol concentration (BAC), expressed as a percentage, among the patrons, and the reported social atmosphere in the pub measured on a visual analogue scale, before and after the intervention programme was given.
BACs of patrons in the intervention pubs reduced by more than those of the patrons in the control pubs at a 1-month follow-up. The mean difference in BAC between intervention and control groups was - 0.011% (95% confidence interval, 0.022,0.000). The intervention group also decreased more in the reported level of rowdy social atmosphere than did the control group. The mean difference was - 6 points (95% confidence interval -11 to -1). No differences were found in reported cosy and high social atmosphere.
Alcohol levels among the patrons decreased and rowdy social atmosphere reduced in the intervention group. Server-training programmes for personnel in student pubs could be a component in the prevention of alcohol problems in university student populations.
Intervention details
Student bartenders. Students in key positions are managing pubs, and they are often young females or males without any previous experience of serving alcohol. The student bartenders generally receive free drinks as their only payment. The high rate of alcohol consumption among patrons in student pubs was of some concern to the board members of the student nations and they were all sympathetic to participating in the study.
The programme was based on manuals, mainly the Alcohol Skills Training Program (ASTP) by Marlatt et al. The rest of the course was based on the Swedish version of the Responsible Beverage Service.
Evaluation details
BACs of patrons in the intervention pubs were reduced by more than those of the patrons in the control pubs at a 1-month follow-up. The mean difference in BAC between intervention and control groups was - 0.011% (95% confidence interval, 0.022,0.000). The intervention group also decreased more in reported level of rowdy social atmosphere than did the control group. The mean difference was - 6 points (95% confidence interval -11 to -1). No differences were found in reported cosy and high social atmosphere.
Johnsson KO & Berglund M (2003). Education of key personnel in student pubs leads to a decrease in alcohol consumption among the patrons: a randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 98, 627-633.
An abstract for this journal article can be found in the HNT literature section here.